01/07/02 - 20:20:58
IP: 126.96.36.199 Browser: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 98)
you said "And, Eth, bringing in people's sexual ferragios does not automatically make a piece of research worthy only of the gutter."
I NEVER said it did! I LOVE SEX---ooops!
What I implied was that the naterial should be presented in sensitive and analytical overall context, in which the necessity of EVEN including it be elucidated. And that is come in a historical context and lineage. Pre and Post,
with all complextities. This is something that you seem possible capable of DELIVERING!
I could not support your life's dream MORE-----
if think I like you--or, whatever.
I don't ignore you because I think you have too much information to ignore. Also because I have undying, and sometimes ill-founded, faith in folks.
Tossing some of your pivot points to the board
prematurely, and out of context, I think defeats your purpose. Maybe it's time to get serious and finish this book.
As you may have noticed previously, I'm in everyone's corner. But only to a point.
Hope the snots are well---the brats are good!!!!
Don't worry anyone, it's just stress relief.....
For Further Reading
Jefferson Starship Message Board Main